I have been enjoying with the game, Warzone, off and on for approximately two months and I have a couple things to say about it. First allow me to start by saying that I enjoy this kind of sport, but not when it made.
In fact, I truly love what the developer, Creative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?search=games Meeting, did with the Battlefield. But after all these years, that first one didn't live until the shooter games and felt obsolete. However, the engine and graphics were great, so they put the next one but at another engine and kept going.
Since that time, Battlefield has come to be a franchise, which probably means this game will also be a money maker. That means they must take the lessons from cod warzone apk android their success and also continue making and have great images.
This game's premise is a futuristic war between supercomputers and you use a variety of foundation vehicles and weapons to kill the enemy. Players also use vehicles which are predicated on the brand names of the automobiles and trucks that we see on the road. These include Rolls Royce Hummers, Mercedes Benz, trucks and SUVs.
This is good because the technology is here, even though it's very different today from the way people play with a game. I wish they would have used game play engine and the graphics since the games. It would have helped the previous one in addition to the newer creation.
They are not the focus, although of course, the infantry remains involved in automobile combat. It does get a little dull to watch all those cars driving on flat roads. They seem as though they are driving . You need to hit someone with a tank or a huge truck and not see a bunch of cars doing the exact same thing.
With all this said, I would have loved to have seen some type of air service. Where they would be positioned if I had an air support group, I could determine. Maybe I am bitter, but I do think that they should have used engine that is same and the graphics that everybody uses.
Obviously, even though the aircraft are not shooting at the bottom, the bases are shooting the aircraft. Then there is the floor component, but the base itself isn't hitting any buildings. The enemy launchers are coming from their buildings, and the tanks are firing the cannons into them, but I can not imagine if the players had an air force, they would be too busy shooting each other with artillery to secure their side of the map.
Maybe the time when it feels as though their artillery is being used by the bases is during the raining storms, then the tanks are able to move in and strike the base. The first time you play the game, although this is fine, you might feel as though your base has been rained on.
Is the tanks. I was formerly one of the men who was on very top of my group, so I would expect to be able to drive up on a tank and shoot it. If you are at the peak of the tower, the view is bad.
The only thing I enjoyed about Warzone is that the group battles. I am not certain but it seems like the majority of the wars end in one or two players winning, which I believe is annoying. It's one thing to have a giant warfare and seem just like it has been acquired by you, but it's just silly, if you are fighting the base of the barrel in an undermanned game.
In general, I think Warzone is great. As long as the graphics and game play are not half baked, it's a game that will cause you to pay close attention to the enemy teams and foundation, but it is nonetheless a good experience.